How to get power naps right
Length: • 3 mins
Annotated by Jeff
Science & technology | Well informed
It’s all in the timing
SaveShare

Jan 23rd 2026|3 min read
Winston Churchill swore by them. After polishing off a boozy lunch and a cigar the former British prime minister would climb into bed for an afternoon nap. The last part of his regime may be worth imitating.
Sleeping during the day is usually the preserve of shift workers and cats. But the science suggests that office workers can benefit, too. A randomised controlled trial in 2023 found that nappers woke up with improvements to mood, alertness and memory. Napping habitually might also be wise. A study from 2007 by the Harvard School of Public Health found that healthy adults who took regular naps had a 37% lower risk of dying from heart disease compared with non-nappers. One published in 2003 in Sleep Health suggested that habitual napping could even add years to your life by slowing the rate at which your brain shrinks with age.
Timing is crucial, though. Sleep scientists tend to agree that a short “power” nap, somewhere between ten and 30 minutes, is best. For example, in 1994 NASA found that a 26-minute power nap enhanced pilots’ physiological awareness and performance. Sleep for too long and you enter the deeper phases of the 90-minute sleep cycle and wake up feeling groggy. You may also struggle to fall asleep at night.
Taking longer naps on a regular basis could even have deleterious effects. A meta-analysis in 2016 concluded that daily naps lasting more than an hour increased the risk of developing diabetes and associated cardiovascular trouble. And a study involving 1,400 participants in 2023 found a link between frequent extended naps and a higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s. An alarm clock is a vital tool for the health-conscious.
Some sleep experts contend that humans are biologically disposed to nap. They point to a natural dip in alertness after midday, caused by fluctuations in the circadian rhythm. Studies which find that power naps do not disrupt night-time sleep also appear to bolster the case for kipping twice a day. In cultures where this is common, however, nappers must nevertheless rest at night for the recommended seven hours.
What types of health consequences, asks Matthew Walker, a neuroscientist, in “Why We Sleep”, have been caused by humans’ abandonment of biphasic sleep (the practice of splitting up daily slumber into two chunks)? Many people recognise the feeling of post-lunch lethargy; few give into it. Nowadays falling asleep in the middle of the day is not always practical—workers have little opportunity to take a voluntary break from consciousness. Some opt for micro-sleeps instead. But the research suggests that the benefits of getting less than five minutes of shut-eye wear off quickly.
Coffee is a popular antidote to midday drowsiness. A nappuccino might work better. A study published in 2008 found power naps to be more effective than caffeine at improving alertness and memory. Research published last year suggested that a midday doze could even reverse the effects of a bad night’s sleep.
“The rest and the spell of sleep in the middle of the day”, Churchill wrote in his autobiography, “refresh the human frame far more than a long night.” Modern sleep experts might not go so far. But if you have time for a Churchillian catnap, it could do you some good. Just remember to set that alarm.■
After a free, evidence-based guide to health and wellness? Sign up to our weekly Well Informed newsletter.
Explore more
ColumnsFollow
Science & technologyFollow
Well informedFollow
News you can useFollow
→See the latest from topics you follow
This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline “The benefits of power naps”

From the January 31st 2026 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
SaveShareReuse this content
More from Science & technology

Well informed
Is a matcha latte better for you than a builder’s brew?
We spill the tea

For the first time in half a century, astronauts are going to the Moon
They will not land. Others, both American and Chinese, soon may

Should the Arctic be refrozen?
It is possible. But as an end in itself, it is not advisable
Satellites encased in wood are in the works
Timber is cheaper and better than alloys, and may be less polluting
To disperse their spores, truffles rely on animals eating other animals
It is a gruesome business
A new study highlights the brain’s role in immune health
It truly is a question of mind over matter