Join 📚 Josh Beckman's Highlights
A batch of the best highlights from what Josh's read, .
But the [hyperobject](https://substack.com/redirect/5f4bf7ff-06aa-4a51-b200-4e45aa670727?j=eyJ1IjoiMXlmdTFqIn0.qYv5NVQwodvs9yAW1b9IqXxz-UTiPAUp4JXaRMXUArU) that is climate change requires the very kind of deliberative and slow thinking that my (perceptive, nearly-graduated) engineering students require and deserve. The kind of thinking-in-writing they don’t seem to know is out there—a fact that is equally alarming—but that they really are hungry for.
Resources for Climate Nihilism
Sara Hendren from undefended / undefeated
I’ve often seen teams leading reliability efforts respond to the question of why their incident analysis efforts aren’t creating more reliable software by doubling down on metadata collection and heavily structured processes. I think of this as *incident legalism*. Incident legalism is when an incident response and analysis program—trying to better drive reliability improvements—becomes focused on compliance and loses empathy for the engineers and teams operating within the program’s processes.
Move past incident response to reliability · GitHub
https://github.com/readme/
Say hi to [mist](https://mist.inanimate.tech)!
• .md only
• share by URL
• real-time multiplayer editing
• comments
• suggest changes.
Mist: Share and Edit Markdown Together, Quickly
Interconnected
...catch up on these, and many more highlights
Readwise