Join 📚 Roger's Highlights
A batch of the best highlights from what roger's read, .
Hard and sometimes frustrating work that it is, writing leads to communication and connection. After The Making of the Atomic Bomb was published, the physics community accepted me into its company as a sort of minor poet laureate. I spoke to the Harvard physics faculty; I spoke at the fiftieth anniversary of the first controlled nuclear chain reaction; I spoke at the fiftieth reunion of the Los Alamos veterans and pioneers. If I’d ever felt I lacked one, the older generation of physicists gave me a community to call my own. I continue to earn royalties from The Making of the Atomic Bomb, which I value, but I value beyond measure the appreciation of people whose work, I believe, forced an end to world-scale war.
How to Write
Richard Rhodes
Nancy Edison also sensed, or discovered by chance, the real direction of her son’s interests; for one day she brought forth an elementary book of physical science, R. G. Parker’s School of Natural Philosophy, which described and illustrated various scientific experiments that could be performed at home. Now his mother found that the boy had truly caught fire. This was “the first book in science I read when a boy, nine years old, the first I could understand,” he later said. Here, learning became a “game” that he loved. He read and tested out every experiment in Parker; then his mother obtained for him an old Dictionary of Science, and he went to work on that. He was now ten and formed a boyish passion for chemistry, gathering together whole collections of chemicals in bottles or jars, which he ranged on shelves in his room. All his pocket money went for chemicals purchased at the pharmacist’s and for scraps of metal and wire. Thus his mother had accomplished that which all truly great teachers do for their pupils: she brought him to the stage of learning things for himself, learning that which most amused and interested him, and she encouraged him to go on in that path. It was the very best thing she could have done for this singular boy. “My mother was the making of me,” he said afterward. “She understood me; she let me follow my bent.”29
There’s a gravity and sense of importance inherent in deep work—whether you’re Ric Furrer smithing a sword or a computer programmer optimizing an algorithm. Gallagher’s theory, therefore, predicts that if you spend enough time in this state, your mind will understand your world as rich in meaning and importance. There is, however, a hidden but equally important benefit to cultivating rapt attention in your workday: Such concentration hijacks your attention apparatus, preventing you from noticing the many smaller and less pleasant things that unavoidably and persistently populate our lives. (The psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, whom we’ll learn more about in the next section, explicitly identifies this advantage when he emphasizes the advantage of cultivating “concentration so intense that there is no attention left over to think about anything irrelevant, or to worry about problems.”) This danger is especially pronounced in knowledge work, which due to its dependence on ubiquitous connectivity generates a devastatingly appealing buffet of distraction—most of which will, if given enough attention, leach meaning and importance from the world constructed by your mind.
...catch up on these, and many more highlights
Readwise